Wallace's Technical Fouls a Concern for Celtics

Limiting Minutes Is Best Way C's Can Use Rasheed in 2009-10 Season

© Ben Carder

Jul 13, 2009
Stock photo:  Hoops, Stock.exchng
Climbing aboard the Celtics' "ubuntu" train will not change Rasheed Wallace's troubles with technicals. The C's should manage his minutes to avoid unnecessary losses.

The Celtics’ signing of Rasheed Wallace is arguably the most impactful acquisition in the NBA’s brief offseason. He dominates the boards, blocks shots at will, and serves as an ideal cog to the defensive prowess of Kevin Garnett and Kendrick Perkins.

But if history is any guide, the signing of Rasheed Wallace could be the most impactful acquisition for all the wrong reasons.

Rasheed Wallace—The Newest Celtic

On July 9, Wallace became an official member of the Boston Celtics. With the Big Three surrounding him, not to mention his coach and general manager, Wallace said all the right things.

“If Doc wants me to start then I’ll start,” said Wallace at last Thursday's press conference. “If Doc wants me to come off the bench, then that’s fine, I’ll come off the bench. Two minutes, 30 minutes, whatever – as long as I’m contributing to the team to get a ‘W.’ That’s my whole bottom line.”

That seems to be everyone’s bottom line these days. Not the individual glory, but the opportunity to win. That’s why Randy Moss joined the Patriots. That’s why Stephon Marbury joined the Celtics – two players reputed to be “me first” players.

As it turned out, both the Moss and Marbury deals panned out – Moss proving to be a much more productive signing than Marbury, no doubt.

No one is expecting Wallace to be the kind of impact player with the Celtics that Moss has been with the Patriots. But Celtics fans should not expect Rasheed Wallace to change his flagrant foul frequenting by donning Celtic green. Why? Because everywhere Rasheed has been, this has been his nom de plume.

Rasheed Different from Moss and Marbury

With Moss and Marbury, their troublemaking was more inconsistent than it was consistent. And “troublemaking” may be overstating how adversely they impacted their respective teams.

Moss’ play with the Vikings was remarkably consistent and impressive, making the Pro Bowl five times in his seven years while there. He’s been the go to guy with the Patriots, breaking Jerry Rice’s record for most touchdown receptions in a single season his first year, and hauling in enough receptions last year to break into the top 10 all-time receivers in yards gained.

The one time in which Moss was perceived to be hurting his team was in 2006 with the hapless Oakland Raiders, when skeptics – hearkening back to 2004 when Moss left the field with seconds to play in Minnesota’s last regular season game (they finished 5-11) – crowed that Moss quit on his team, even though he was plagued by injury much of the time.

The same standard applies to Marbury. Admittedly, the public feuds Marbury had between former Knicks coaches Isaiah Thomas and Larry Brown were disruptive enough to bench him, thus adversely impacting his team as a result, but besides the 2007-08 season, his lack of game time has never been due to personal or professional skirmishes.

The same can’t be said for Rasheed Wallace. Though he’s never been perceived as a clubhouse cancer, the frequency with which he gets hit with technical fouls has no doubt affected him teams’ ability to win games (like in the Game Six Eastern Conference Finals against the Cavaliers, when he was hit with two technical fouls, thus leaving him out of Game Seven had the Pistons won Game Six).

Rasheed's Reputation May Hurt Celtics

And don’t underestimate the value of reputation. Like it or not, players with bad reputations – or teams known to be frequent flagrant foul violators – are given very little latitude when it comes to outbursts. An outraged LeBron James is ignored, while an outraged Rasheed Wallace – a guy who’s led the technical foul statistical column six times since 2001 and been among the top three “tech getters” eight times since 2001 – elicits a quick-to-tweet ref whistle. How present a presence Wallace is in the Celtics lineup will dictate whether or not he exudes that “tech rep” on his team (remember, Kendrick Perkins was sixth among technical foul leaders last year).

Boston has been something of a bastion for perceived cancers or malcontents to “turn it around.” But for players like Corey Dillon, Randy Moss, et al, they all came from losing teams. Wallace hasn’t changed his stripes no matter what uniform color he’s donned, or how successful they were in the win-loss column.

It’s hard to know how many points or wins have been lost because of Rasheed’s antics, but technicals are administered because they hurt a team’s ability to win. A team with a low technical foul count should not be underestimated.

How the Celtics Should Use Rasheed

The Celtics and Rivers would be wise to take Rasheed’s own recommendation: have him “come off the bench.” With Eastern Conference rivals like Orlando and Cleveland padding their already stacked roster, the Celtics’ competition is more star-studded than ever.

Keeping the reigns on Rasheed will help the Celitcs win (keeping the reigns on=managing minutes). By granting him lots of minutes, that’s more opportunity for technical trouble, and the fruits of those technicals (a foul shot and possession) could be the difference between a key win or loss in the 2009-10 season.


The copyright of the article Wallace's Technical Fouls a Concern for Celtics in NBA is owned by Ben Carder. Permission to republish Wallace's Technical Fouls a Concern for Celtics in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Stock photo:  Hoops, Stock.exchng
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo